A known third cousin of my father submitted his DNA for analysis at 23andme. He and my father share a pair of great great grandparents, Calvin Cook and Mary Neil. This couple was married in Morris County, New Jersey in 1847.
23andme correctly predicted the relationship of 3rd cousins.
My father and his third cousin share 0.93% of their DNA over two segments. This is within the amount of shared DNA that we would expect third cousins to share. The International Society of Genetic Genealogy proposes that third cousins share an average of 0.781% of their DNA. To visualize the parameters, second cousins would share about 3.125% and fourth cousins would share about 0.195%. So these third cousins are right on target with their 0.93% of shared DNA.
I am this man's third cousin, once removed because I am in the next generation. (I am a fourth cousin of his children.) Yet he and I do not share any DNA. That is how random inheritance is.
So what do we do with this information when we are done congratulating ourselves for accurately tracing a few generations? We see who else in the DNA database matches this known third cousin along the same segments that he shares with my father.
The third cousin and my father match along chromosomes 13 and 21. At this time, my father has no other matches in the database in this area of chromosome 21. (I do, but I know that the matches come from my mother and not from my father.) My father does have two other matches along the same area of chromosome 13. You have two sides to each chromosome, one from each parent. When someone matches you in the genetic database, you do not know which parent's side the match is on, unless your parents are also in the database. My grandparents are not in the database (and will not be because they are dead). It is not likely that you will be digging up dead ancestors to retrieve DNA specimens. What you can do instead is have known (living) cousins from different branches submit their specimens. The third cousin is related through my father's mother. The two other people who match my father on the same area of chromosome 13 are related through my father's father because they do not match the known third cousin on this area. We still don't know the relation of these other two people, but we have narrowed down the prospects.
Growing family trees from leaves and branches. Finding lost relatives. Solving family mysteries. Concentrating in New Jersey and New York.
Pages
- Home
- Surnames and Locations of My GGG Grandparents
- DURYEA New Jersey Births
- DURYEA New Jersey Marriages
- DURYEA New Jersey Deaths
- DURYEA New York State Marriage Index
- DURYEA New York State Death Index 1881-1950
- Pictures by Clifford Lutter 1930s-1960s New Jersey
- ODonnell- New Jersey Records
- Hit or Miss Records
- Adoption Laws New Jersey
- Genealogy Humor
- Bayonne Neighbors
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Old Occupations
One of the useful entries on the federal census is the occupation or trade. Some of the entries are quite entertaining, such as Peter Spear's occupation of "Hermit." Maybe he was not too happy to be disturbed by the census taker at his doorstep.
![]() |
| 1870 federal census for Peter Spear, Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey |
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Mystery Canine Photos
I eagerly opened this envelope of professional quality photos, hoping, as always, to find images of relatives of long ago. Instead I found a black cocker spaniel dog.
There is really no good explanation. Nobody was devoted to dogs, bred them, showed them, nothing. This dog probably did little more than exist as a living decoration in a minimalist household, so one must wonder why these pictures came into being and then survived the ages.
There is really no good explanation. Nobody was devoted to dogs, bred them, showed them, nothing. This dog probably did little more than exist as a living decoration in a minimalist household, so one must wonder why these pictures came into being and then survived the ages.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Mystery Photos
This posting is one of several concenring a stack of old photographs that I recently received. Most are not labeled, so I am attempting to ascertain something about the subjects.
This photograph looks to be professional and from the 1920s, judging by the bob hairstyle and soft makeup.
This photograph is larger than the one above. I am thinking that these pictures capture the same woman. This photograph was mounted to a board with the photographer's credentials.
Jay Te Winburn of Montclair, New Jersey was the photographer of the second picture, and perhaps the first. A little checking for him in the census finds him in Montclair, Essex County, New Jersey in 1920 and 1930, working as a photographer.
Once the photographer was located and dated, I googled him. I uncovered several generations of Winburn photographers. It seems that the Winburn who snapped the above photos specialized in prestigious weddings.
Finding information on the photographer's main subject, weddings and brides, can help us with the above photos. The woman or women in the pictures had enough money to have pictures done by a prestigious photographer. These could be engagement or wedding shots. So I am looking for a woman in my family tree who was married around 1920 and had enough money to splurge on these photos. She did not necessarily have to live in or near Montclair, as she could have travelled to Mr. Winburn's studio, or he could have travelled to her. I have several candidates. Having the groom in the pictures may have helped.
This photograph looks to be professional and from the 1920s, judging by the bob hairstyle and soft makeup.
This photograph is larger than the one above. I am thinking that these pictures capture the same woman. This photograph was mounted to a board with the photographer's credentials.
Jay Te Winburn of Montclair, New Jersey was the photographer of the second picture, and perhaps the first. A little checking for him in the census finds him in Montclair, Essex County, New Jersey in 1920 and 1930, working as a photographer.
![]() |
| 1920 census for 563 Bloomfield avenue, Montclair, Essex County, New Jersey |
![]() |
| LIFE Magazine 15 July 1940 via Google Books |
Friday, May 20, 2011
A few words instead of a picture
Family historians seek to associate a face with the stark facts of life they assemble about people of long ago in order to have more than a mere collection of names, places, and dates. I love to find photographs of ancestors. Today we can snap pictures easily on our phones. Just a generation ago, this was impossible and for generations before them, well, photographs were not very common. I have several unidentified older photographs of relatives (or dear friends, we may never know), and sites like ebay are filled with beautiful, old, and unmarked photographs of somebody's ancestors.
I am sorting through my finds in a family file from Morristown, New Jersey and was struck by a paragraph in a compiled genealogy submitted by the late Louis Cook in the 1970s and 1980s. He tells the reader that there are few photos of ancestors before 1900. This does not mean that I will stop looking and hoping for photographs. It's as if he just knew that future researchers would want images for the names. Not to disappoint, he provided us with physical descriptions to fuel the imagination.
I am sorting through my finds in a family file from Morristown, New Jersey and was struck by a paragraph in a compiled genealogy submitted by the late Louis Cook in the 1970s and 1980s. He tells the reader that there are few photos of ancestors before 1900. This does not mean that I will stop looking and hoping for photographs. It's as if he just knew that future researchers would want images for the names. Not to disappoint, he provided us with physical descriptions to fuel the imagination.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














