Friday, April 24, 2026

The Tragedy of Willard's Cemetery

Imagine enduring a difficult life within the confines of a mental institution, only to be laid to rest in an unmarked grave identified by nothing more than a number. No headstone with your name and dates. Even in death, you remain unreachable, as the records that could guide loved ones to your grave are withheld. This is the ongoing injustice faced by those buried in the defunct cemetery at Willard Asylum in Seneca County, New York.

Find A Grave memorial page for the person buried in grave 13.
New York will not allow anyone to see who lies in this grave.

The facility was known by several names over the years. Asylum and Insane are words that have fallen out of favor in current American English. Willard State Hospital is a defunct facility that housed tens of thousands of people deemed "insane." The remnants are located in Willard, a hamlet of Romulus, Seneca County, New York.

Modern map showing location of Willard Hospital and its cemetery

Willard was one of the many state hospitals created in the 1870s in response to a growing movement to treat the mentally ill better in sprawling campuses and formally trained staff. (See my article on Nurse Julia Flanagan.) A centralized state facility relieved the counties of financial burdens of insane paupers. Most patients were too poor to provide for themselves. And some of them were mentally ill by today's standards.

And- they were called inmates, not patients as we do today. They were literally locked up with no recourse. They had few recognized rights. Medications to treat schizophrenia were invented in the 1950s.

Part of the hospital grounds includes a cemetery where the patients were buried. Most plots were not marked, meaning no stones were erected. (This was a standard practice. See my article mentioning burials of Edith Duryea and her child in Laurel Hill in Secaucus, New Jersey.) Records were created and maintained over the decades and were sent to the New York State Archives. Today the cemetery is in disrepair.

Here's the problem: the records of this cemetery are prohibited from being viewed. Why? No logical reason, in my opinion. The boxes of records are described on the webpage of the Archives' finding aidA New York State law is cited as the authority for blocking access.

"Access Restrictions. Restricted in accordance with Mental Hygiene Law, Section 33.13, relating to confidentiality of clinic records."

I can't excerpt the wording in this law that prohibits access to cemetery records because NONE EXISTS. This law clearly pertains to confidentiality of very recent patient CLINICAL records because it discusses who may receive records: police, targets of the patient, and close family members. There is no mention of great great grandchildren's access. The spouses and children of patients in these sought-out historical records are also dead. They can't request access to records.

There is a bill in the New York State Legislature that would make public these burial records.¹ It's a shame that all that effort and time must be lodged to counteract a deliberate misapplication of a law. 

If the burial records were allowed to be viewed at the Archives, I doubt many people would look at them. Part of the reason is that they would essentially be inaccessible to people who do not live close to Albany and can visit during the few hours the building is open.

If the burial records were digitized and placed online, a few more people would view them, but not many. Where is the harm? I see only benefit. The "inmates" had no rights once locked away. Prohibiting access to their burial records completes their sequestration from society and their families. It's simple cruelty.

Inhabitants of institutions were included on the federal census every ten years. Although a person was removed from society, this process and their status at Willard was not a contemporaneous secret. Below is a page from the 1900 federal census for Romulus and Ovid listing patients at Willard State Hospital.

1900 United States Federal Census
Patients at Willard State Hospital
Ovid and Romulus Towns, Seneca County, New York

Clinical records of inmates can include detailed descriptions of their family relations and the circumstances that lead to placement in the state hospital. This provides missing insight into past generations and is invaluable to genealogical studies.

For further reading on advocacy of Willard Hospital, please see the blog The Inmates of Willard

At Find A Grave, 727 burials are listed. Some veterans and numbers have pictures of stones. Most are names without pictures.


Other States

Other states have placed records online relating to mental health records and burials of the these people.

Below are images from records available for Rhode Island and California available on Ancestry.

Burial ledger. Dexter Asylum in Providence, Rhode Island.
Collection at Ancestry
"Providence, Rhode Island, U.S., Dexter Asylum and Almshouse Records, 1828-1956"

Case Books, Personal Description List (Females), 1900-1920
Sonoma State Hospital, Eldridge, California
Collection at Ancestry
"California, U.S., State Hospital Records, 1856-1923"


Future Endeavors

It's time to release these stigmatized records in all states and allow researchers to uncover family mysteries and bring to light the historical treatment of people deemed mentally ill.




¹ New York Senate Bill S08903 and Assembly Bill A10242, 2025–2026 legislative session.


Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Genealogy Word Search Book

I published my first book.

It's a fun word search book with genealogical terms and themes.

I always thought my first genealogy book would be reference, but here we are in a completely different direction.

Genealogy Word Searches by Jody Lutter

Genealogy Word Searches

by Jody Lutter

Enjoy a fun and engaging way to explore genealogy with this collection of word searches. Perfect for family historians, researchers, and anyone who loves puzzles with a historical twist.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Multiple Marriages in the 1910 Census

The United States federal census provides a framework for tracing families every ten years (except the mostly destroyed 1890). Later census forms asked more detailed questions of all members of households.

Marital status became a question in 1880.

The 1910 census asked two questions about marital status:
Question 8. Whether single, married, widowed, or divorced.
Question 9. Number of years of present marriage.
Questions on the 1910 federal census.
Questions 8 and 9 pertained to marital status.

Enumerators were to mark answers in accordance with rules that are not reflected on the census form. The rule for question 8: ". . . if this is the first marriage, write 'M1,' but if this is the second or subsequent marriage, write 'M2' (meaning married more than once)."
Instructions to the enumerator about how to record the answer
to Question 8 about marital status

Answers on the census can be wildly inaccurate. But the 1910 census can mislead the researcher with the answers about marriage. M1 means first marriage, but M2 means more than one marriage, not necessarily the second marriage.

We will look at two people to illustrate this question in the 1910 census, Albert Baldwin Duryea (1853-1924) and Minnie Tuthill (1870-1941).

Albert Baldwin Duryea

Albert was the son of George Winfield Duryea (1823-1892) and Barbara Ann Savidge (1825-18xx). He was born around 1853, probably in Montgomery, Somerset County, New Jersey.

On March 18, 1882 Albert married Margaret Lear Heavener (1851-1903) in Upper Black Eddy, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. This union produced two children, Paul Gamble Duryea (1883-1966) and Edwin Jayne Duryea (1886-1942).

On May 6, 1905 Albert married Virginia Stryker (1854-1907) in Trenton, Mercer County, New Jersey. Virginia was the widow of William S Barr. She died two and a half years later from cancer of the bowels.
Marriage certificate
Albert B Duryea and Virginia S Stryker
married May 6, 1905
in Trenton, Mercer County, New Jersey

On May 15, 1908 Albert married Elizabeth Tinsman Morris (1850-1925) in Trenton.
Marriage certificate
Albert Baldwin Duryea and Elizabeth Morris Comly
married May 15, 1908
in Trenton, Mercer County, New Jersey

This brings us to the 1910 census. Albert Duryea and his wife Elizabeth were enumerated in Trenton with a boarder, William Hillpot.
1910 federal census in Trenton, New Jersey
Household of Albert Duryea


For Question 8, "M2" is written for the marital status of Albert and Elizabeth. Elizabeth had at least one prior marriage (looks like "Comly") on her marriage certificate to Albert. We found three marriages for Albert. This is an illustration of M2 properly indicating more than one marriage and not second marriage.
Close up of 1910 federal census
Albert was on marriage number 3. "M2" was the correct response.

Minnie Tuthill


Tuthill or Tuttle and variations is a popular name from Suffolk County, New York. Minnie was born around 1870 in Riverhead to Albert Daniel Tuthill (1846-1920) and Hannah Erskine (1847-1927).

Minnie's marital history is vague at times, but we will see what we can see.

On January 10, 1887 Minnie C Tuthill married John Edwin Duryea in Riverhead- according to the New York State Marriage Index. As of this writing, New York is still refusing to release genealogical copies of records.

In the 1900 census, Minnie Gusswiller was enumerated in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey with her husband, Frank Gusswiller. They were married for nine years. She had six children, four still living, listed with birth years from 1888 through 1899, all using the surname Gusswiller.

John E Duryea died February 22, 1901 in Trenton, Mercer County, New Jersey. 
Death certificate of John E Duryea
died February 22, 1901
in Long Branch, Monmouth County, New Jersey.

If Minnie Tuthill married Frank Gusswiller around 1891, she would have need to have divorced her first husband, John Duryea. I use "if" because I have not found a possible entry in the marriage indexes for Minnie and Frank in New Jersey, New York, and New York City.

This brings us to the 1910 census. Minnie Woodin and her husband, William Woodin, were enumerated in Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County, New York. His marital status was "M1," married five years. Her marital status was "M2," married five years. She had ten children, six still living. With them were five children. Four children were named Gusswiller and were ages 9 through 19. William Woodin, final child, was three years old.
1910 federal census in Poughkeepsie, New York
Household of William Woodin

Close up of 1910 federal census
Minnie was on marriage number 2 or 3. "M2" was the correct response.

The answer "M2" means that she was married at least twice and is not indicative of whether she and Frank Gusswiller actually married.

Minnie continued marrying after the 1910 census. In the 1920 census, Minnie Woodin, married, was still in Poughkeepsie, but without a husband. From the New York State marriage indexes we find that on October 20, 1920 Minnie M Trythill aka Gussweller married John Henry in Beacon, Dutchess County; on July 27, 1937 Minnie Henry married Charles Hults.

Minnie M Hults died December 25, 1941 in Poughkeepsie.
Obituary of Minnie M Hults (born Tuttle or Tuthill)
December 27, 1941

Minnie's husbands as far as I can tell:
18xx  Frank X Gusswiller (1862-19xx)
19xx  William J Woodin (1868-19xx)
1920  John Henry (18xx-19xx)
1937  Charles Hults (1865-1954)


Minnie's children as far as I can find:

Everett Tuthill Duryea (1890-1937)
Elnora Frances Gusswiller (1893-1893)
Frances Gusswiller (1897-1898)



A note about Edith, the daughter of John E Duryea and Minnie Tuthill: she had a troubled life. She was born May 16, 1888 in Jersey City.
Birth certificate
Edith Mabel Duryea
born May 16, 1888 in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey.
First child of John E Duryea and Minnie M Tuthill.

Newspaper article from the Evening Journal of Jersey City November 21, 1907.
"Mrs Gussmiller angry at her arrest."

In the 1910 census, Edith "Gusswiller" was an "inmate" at Laurel Hill in Secaucus, Hudson County. This institution housed those who were mentally ill or infirm. It was also called Snake Hill, or Hudson County Insane Asylum, and still exists today as "Meadowview Psychiatric Hospital." Edith was still there in the 1920, 1930, and 1940 censuses, but under the name Duryea, not Gusswiller.

This is why I think that the baby named "Peter Duryea or Gussweller" was hers. I did not find a birth certificate for him, but he was issued a death certificate. He died at the Hudson County Insane Hospital on January 21, 1913 from inanition. His date of birth was December 13, 1912. He was "out of wedlock." Only his mother was listed on his death certificate- "Edith Duryea or Gussweller."

I searched unsuccessfully for a marriage between Duryea and Gussweller. With the additional information gathered about Minnie Tuthill and her daughter, Edith Duryea, I think that Peter was the baby of Edith.
Death certificate of Peter Duryea or Gussweller.
Died January 21, 1913 at the Hudson County Insane Hospital in Secaucus, New Jersey.
Age 1 month. Mother- Edith Duryea or Gussweller.
Burial at Laurel Hill. Undertaker Alms House.

Burials at Laurel Hill were unmarked, which was not an unusual practice at such institutions. Laurel Hill burials included not only people from the insane asylum, but also from the alms house, tuberculosis hospital, and jail. Records were kept, but supposedly Hudson County cannot find them today. In 2002, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority sought to extend part of the Turnpike (Interstate 95) into the burial area and found bones and artifacts when construction crews started digging. It is thought that over 10,000 people were buried in this area.

When Edith Duryea died in 1943, she too was buried in an unmarked grave at Laurel Hill. Her usual address was in Poughkeepsie, connecting her to her late mother's residence since at least 1910.
Death certificate of Edith Duryea
died December 29, 1943 in Secaucus, Hudson County, New Jersey
at the Hudson County Hospital for Incurable Diseases.
Burial at Laurel Hill.

For pictures and further reading on Laurel Hill and the burials, see Weird New Jersey and this article from NJ dot com.


When reviewing the 1910 census, be mindful that the answer "M2" for a married person means that this is at least the second marriage. You would still need to use other records to discover marriages and their disposition.