Saturday, May 23, 2026

Wedding Book from 1901


Thank you to the person who sent me this marriage book from 1901. (She found me through this blog. She was cleaning out an old desk.)

The marrying parties were Louis Kraus and Christine Zoeller. They married January 21, 1901 in Newark, Essex County, New Jersey. A letter was inside the book, providing additional details. The letterhead was that of First German Reformed Church at 31 Blum Street in Newark. This church is called Second (West) Reformed Church on the Old Newark website.
Letter inside the book. There was no certificate of marriage within the book.


First German Reformed Church
31 Blum Street, Newark, New Jersey
Frederick Steinmann, Pastor

May 5, 1930

To whom it may concern

This is to certify that the
attached Certificate of Marriage
is a true copy of the record
left by the Rev C Girtanner.

Frederick Steinmann, Pastor


Louis Kraus (1879-1930) was the son of Edward Kraus (1859-1902) and Helen Benz (1860-1931). Christine Zoeller (1885-1957) was the daughter of Anna Elizabeth Stieber (1848-1929) and Louis Zoeller (1851-1919). They are buried at Woodland Cemetery in Newark.

Reverend Carl Girtanner was the pastor from 1884-1918 according to the Old Newark website. Frederick Steinmann (1897-1992) was the pastor from 1927-1966.



If anyone would like these physical objects, please message me.

This is similar to an item that I received from the wedding of my great grandparents, Howard Lutter and Ethel Laurel Winterton. They were married in Newark in 1910.
Cover of wedding book of Howard Lutter and Ethel Laurel Winterton, 1910


Friday, May 22, 2026

The Death Certificate My Scanner Would Not Copy

Genealogy rule: make digital copies of all records, mementos, pictures, letters.


The death certificate for my recently departed paternal aunt was issued by the local town. The document was printed on 8 1/2 by 14 inch legal-size paper, which is awkward to store and scan.
New Jersey certificate of death
Issued May 2026

I have an older, no-frills scanner that is too short for fourteen inch documents. I tried a newer, more sophisticated scanner that could accommodate legal size paper. The scanner refused!

Modern New Jersey death certificates contained security features that some scanners detect and block from copying. Sometimes these security features cause the word "VOID" to appear faintly in scanned images. I would have been satisfied with such a result, but this scanner refused to scan the document at all.
Example of "VOID" appearing if document is copied

An iPhone 17 ultimately captured the image.

New Jersey offers a "certification" of a death record for genealogy, which can be copied; however, the Social Security number and causes of death are redacted. I prefer unredacted records when possible.



Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Precursor to New Jersey's Modern Archival Preservation

From the newspaper Elizabeth Daily Journal of Elizabeth, Union County, New Jersey. Published February 26, 1917.


HISTORIC PAPERS NOT PRESERVED

Important N. J. Documents “Lost, Strayed or Stolen.”

TRENTON, Feb. 26.—While the State of New Jersey, one of the original thirteen colonies which formed the organization of the United States, is rich in historical lore, she is sadly lacking in the preservation of the documents and records which tell the story of the commonwealth’s career, according to the report filed to-day with Governor Edge and the Legislature by the Commission on the Condition of Public Records of the State of New Jersey.

Senate Bill No. 248, introduced by Senator Stevens of Cape May, providing for the establishment of a department of public records, is recommended for enactment to cure the situation which now exists.

The report to the Governor says such valuable public records of the State as the original grants of land in New Jersey, many of the original journals of the General Assembly, Provincial Congress, Constitutional Convention of 1776, messages and official correspondence of Governors, petitions to the General Assembly, court dockets and minutes, town and township records and other manuscripts of priceless value are in private possession. In many cases they have been abstracted from the official files of the State, sometimes by high public officials of other days. Some have been thrown out of public offices as junk by careless and ignorant officials. Others have been given to the relatives of public officials through their last wills and testaments. They have been mutilated and destroyed for personal gain.

"Again," says the report, “many of these valuable historic records have been floating around the auction houses of the country for the past seventy years, sold and resold, and the spoils of the plunder divided between the auctioneers and the marauder. These conditions are startling and shocking to the sense of mankind in this age of civilization. They should be immediately stamped out for all time.”

Three Governors of the State, Voorhees, Fort and Fielder, at different times in their administrations have been forced to command private interests to turn over to the State rare old papers of record which were about to be sold in auction rooms in the larger cities.

No less abominable, however, is the condition of the public records of certain municipalities of the State, says the report. The cities of Perth Amboy and Burlington have no records for the first 250 years of their incorporated existence and the records of many of the other municipalities are in practically the same condition.

For centuries nearly every European country has systematically preserved its public records and many of the States of the Union have or are doing the same.

One of the most glaring features of our ancient records has been their abstraction, a practice in vogue for more than a century, and the investigations of the commission finds that a large portion of them are now held and controlled by private interests, to the exclusion of citizens of this State who are by law entitled to a gratuitous examination of them for legitimate purposes.

One of the records retained in a private family are the original grants- leases and releases- given by James, Duke of York, to the territory and government of the Province of New Jersey, and of East and West Jersey, respectively, accompanied with nearly 200 kindred papers. This family resides in an adjoining State.

The report says that more than a century and a quarter ago a certain official of one of the most important records offices of the State abstracted nearly all the records of his office upon his retirement, his successor doing the same, when he retired sixty years later. “These papers are now held intact by their respective descendants residing in New Jersey,” says the report, which adds, "the present head of the family is willing that they be turned over to the proper State authorities.”

Some sixty years ago the original memorials, petitions and other communications presented to the Provincial Congress were possessed by a particular family in Virginia, who then turned them over to certain private interests in New Jersey, where they now remain. The Federal Government borrowed military records of the Revolutionary War to use in settling pension claims, and has never returned them. Many public records have been mutilated in order to obtain autographs. The commission was told it would be charged $1 a day to examine certain records held by private organization, yet the papers belong to the State.

The bill advocated by the report provides a non-salaried commission of three to supervise the work of preserving the records.

Newspaper article transcribed above.
Click to enlarge.