The AncestryDNA test kit has been utilized. The donor of the DNA sample was adopted in New Jersey in 1936. Although the original birth certificate is not available, the court records are public. [A 1940 statute sealed future adoption records.] The documents are housed in the Essex County Hall of Records and are not indexed, but I had a date and adoptive parents' names to work with, so I found the correct papers easily.
I have the name of her mother, but no other identifying information, such as her age. I do not know if this is the mother's birth name or a married name. No father is mentioned. Even though I know the name of the person I am seeking, I cannot be sure that I found her.
The traditional paperwork research reveals that there were a few families using this last name or a variant in Essex County, New Jersey, and many more families of this name if the search is expanded to neighboring counties. The first name of the birth mother was popular in every branch, with most family units naming a baby girl this way, and many men marrying a woman of this name. The result was many eligible candidates with nobody alive today to confirm which one was the mother.
We shall see what the test tells us.
Growing family trees from leaves and branches. Finding lost relatives. Solving family mysteries. Concentrating in New Jersey and New York.
Pages
- Home
- Surnames and Locations of My GGG Grandparents
- DURYEA New Jersey Births
- DURYEA New Jersey Marriages
- DURYEA New Jersey Deaths
- DURYEA New York State Marriage Index
- DURYEA New York State Death Index 1881-1950
- Pictures by Clifford Lutter 1930s-1960s New Jersey
- ODonnell- New Jersey Records
- Hit or Miss Records
- Adoption Laws New Jersey
- Genealogy Humor
- Bayonne Neighbors
Friday, June 22, 2012
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Autosomal DNA Matching: A Diagram
![]() |
People without extensively documented trees may have a problem making connections to their genetic distant cousins. This should not hold you back from testing your DNA and may be the only way of discovering otherwise elusive lines. DNA testing does not replace "traditional" genealogical research of original documents, census entries, cemetery records, etc. DNA testing can also reveal ancestry for people who are adopted and, if a close match is in the database, can reveal the family of origin.
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
DNA Matching: Autosomal versus Y-DNA
When my DNA results produce matches at 23andMe, I look at two factors to try to figure out the most recent common ancestor, or the source of the little identical segments of DNA. The first source is common surnames and the second is common geographical areas. Both options pose their own problems, but you need to try some path to make the match. Surnames change over the generations. People move around, from state to state and continent to continent. Someone may not uncover all areas that their ancestor called home. Autosomal DNA testing reveals the little segments of DNA that you still carry from your distant ancestors. Some other descendants of these same ancestors still carry the same segments, producing a "match." The trick is identifying which ancestor or ancestors you have in common with your genetic match.
I have a few matches where I can't say for sure that we have uncovered the common ancestor, but we seem to have good leads. One is the surname Rockefeller. Henry Oscar Rockefeller compiled a family genealogy in the early 1900s, focusing mainly on this line, the immigrant Diell Rockefeller (died New York 1769), but also discussed some of the other Rockefeller lines in the area. I descend from Diell Rockefeller through my father's mother. At 23andMe, we both match a man who is descended from another immigrant, Johann Peter Rockefeller (died New Jersey about 1766).
It is not known if Johann Peter and Diell were related. Does the above DNA comparison show that the two Rockefeller immigrants Johann Peter and Diell were related? Not necessarily. We could have other ancestors in common that we do not know about that are causing the match.
The DNA testing that could show if both Rockefeller immigrants were related is Y-DNA testing. Direct male descendants of both men could compare their Y chromosomes. The Y chromosome is passed almost unchanged from father to son and then to his son as so on down the line of descent. Neither my father nor our "Distant Cousin" here can participate in such a test because the last Rockefeller in both of their lines was a female, hence breaking the Y chromosome inheritance.
I have a few matches where I can't say for sure that we have uncovered the common ancestor, but we seem to have good leads. One is the surname Rockefeller. Henry Oscar Rockefeller compiled a family genealogy in the early 1900s, focusing mainly on this line, the immigrant Diell Rockefeller (died New York 1769), but also discussed some of the other Rockefeller lines in the area. I descend from Diell Rockefeller through my father's mother. At 23andMe, we both match a man who is descended from another immigrant, Johann Peter Rockefeller (died New Jersey about 1766).
![]() |
23andMe.com Autosomal DNA comparison of the descendant ("Distant Cousin") of Johann Peter Rockefeller to my father and me. We match on a small segment of Chromosome 12. |
It is not known if Johann Peter and Diell were related. Does the above DNA comparison show that the two Rockefeller immigrants Johann Peter and Diell were related? Not necessarily. We could have other ancestors in common that we do not know about that are causing the match.
The DNA testing that could show if both Rockefeller immigrants were related is Y-DNA testing. Direct male descendants of both men could compare their Y chromosomes. The Y chromosome is passed almost unchanged from father to son and then to his son as so on down the line of descent. Neither my father nor our "Distant Cousin" here can participate in such a test because the last Rockefeller in both of their lines was a female, hence breaking the Y chromosome inheritance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)