I met a fifth cousin online ("R.B.") when she wrote to me after I posted pictures of our mutual family graves. Our common ancestors are our 4th great grandparents, Stephen Cook (1797-1853) and Elizabeth vanderHoof (1799-1878) of Morris County, New Jersey. R.B. tested her autosomal DNA at FamilyTreeDNA while most of my family tested at 23andMe. I previously uploaded results for some family members from 23andMe to FamilyTreeDNA, but R.B. was not in the matches. Once you reach the third cousin level, your chances of sharing any identical autosomal DNA drop.
So we turned to GedMatch to compare our DNA. GedMatch accepts files of DNA tests done at Ancestry, 23andMe, and FamilyTreeDNA.
R.B. and I share no detectable identical DNA.
GedMatch.com No DNA detected between my fifth cousin, R. B., and me |
Fortunately, I have members of the prior generation to test. When choosing relatives to take DNA tests, the oldest generation available is preferred because half the DNA is lost with each new generation.
R.B. shares a little identical DNA with my father and my father's third cousin from this Cook line. This could be a coincidence of no genealogical value, or it could be the same DNA passed generation to generation from Stephen Cook or Elizabeth vanderHoof.
Fortunately, my father's siblings have also tested. One sibling may demonstrate a match where another one will not. That is the case with my uncle.
R.B. and my uncle share two small segments of identical DNA, enough to trigger an estimate to the Most Recent Common Ancestor: 4.7 generations. The actual number of generations back to the most common recent ancestors, Stephen Cook and Elizabeth vanderHoof, is 5 generations from my father and uncle and 6 generations from R.B.
Chart of Consanguinity My uncle is 5 generations from Stephen Cook and Elizabeth vanderHoof, while R.B. is 6 generations from this couple, so R.B. and my uncle are 4th cousins, once removed. |
What is gained from this information? Two items.
First, the shared DNA within the parameters of the 4th to 5th cousin range makes it more likely that we have the correct Cook family lines. It is not proof that we are related through Cook and vanderHoof, as the identical DNA could be from another shared line that we are unaware of at this time.
Second, we can view other genetic cousin matches on these same segments and specifically look for connections to Cook or vanderHoof.
I am trying to determine if my cousin by my 2nd great grandmother also shares the same 2nd great grandfather. We believe that he may be the same man who simply changed his name as there are absolutely NO clues as to anyone 'north' of him at all. If my cousin was actually only connected to my 2nd great grandma, but not my 2nd great grandpa, would she show up as my 3rd cousin 1x removed in our dna? Because she does. She would actually be at this level if we were both related to these grandparents, but I am wondering if it would change it if she were only related by one of them? Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThird cousins can share anywhere from no DNA to over 100 cMs.
DeleteDNA skews beyond the parent to child relationship. A "half" third cousin could share more DNA than a "full" third cousin.
"Would she show up as my 3rd cousin 1x removed in our DNA?" I do not know what this means. The amount of shared DNA is used to analyze results.
You could be related on more than one ancestral line, so someone appearing among your DNA matches does not confirm that the shared DNA comes from the ancestor or ancestors you hope it does. You need to delve into the shared segments shared between the two of you and other suspected blood relatives of this couple.