Thursday, January 11, 2018

The Life of Elizabeth Duryea, born 1836

While collecting marriages of Duryeas in New Jersey, I happened upon a record for Elizabeth T Duryea. She remarried to Augustus B Palmer in 1885 in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey.


This explains why Augustus B Palmer is on the monument for Elizabeth's first husband, children, sister, and mother at Cypress Hills Cemetery in Queens, New York. Elizabeth herself has no inscription and the cemetery found no record of her burial, so her date of death continues to elude me.





Augustus B Palmer was born in Maine around 1843. He probably relocated to New York City in the 1870s. His death in 1891 was reported in The City Record; he joined the police in 1877.





An brief mention in The Evening World newspaper told of Policeman Palmer's death in Maine on April 19, 1891, where he was on sick leave.

Augustus B Palmer also has an inscription on his family's monument in Dover Cemetery in Dover-Foxcroft, Piscataquis County, Maine. His residence, career, and wife in New York City may easily have gone unconnected.

I do not know what became of Elizabeth after the death of Augustus. She does not appear as his widow in the New York City directories.

One year before Augustus' death, Elizabeth was in the 1890 Veterans Schedule at 304 East 125th street in New York City, the same address as the city directories. Closer inspection of her entry shows "Palmer" scribbled next to her name.



Elizabeth's life was not easy.

She was born in 1836 in New York City after the death of her father, John H Duryea. She joined a sister, Catherine Jane. Their mother, Sarah Moffitt, remarried to Joseph Scott.

In 1854, Elizabeth married Joseph Jones in New York City; they adopted the last name Henley. Joseph died during the Civil War as a prisoner in Texas, making her a widow with two children. Any other children had died.

Elizabeth and Joseph had four known children. None had surviving issue. They used the surname Henley.
-Frederick, born about 1855 in Michigan; died 1887 in California.
-Lambert Scott, born about 1858 in Ohio; died in 1861.
-Augustus B, born about 1859 in Ohio; died in 1931.
-Florence May, born about 1863, died in 1864.

I do not know why the children were born outside New York or New Jersey.

After discovering Elizabeth's marriage to Augustus B Palmer, I wonder if there was a prior connection between them that caused her to name a son Augustus B.

Elizabeth's sister, Catherine Jane, first married William Leander, then Harry Abraham Lockwood. These unions produced no known surviving issue. Thus, this branch has extinguished.












Thursday, December 28, 2017

Final Week of Sales and Coupons at Family Tree DNA

Family Tree DNA's sale on genetic genealogy kits ends December 31.

Below are coupon codes to use on the discounted prices.


Discount
Code   EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2017


$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34CKLY98MZC
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34PVSUZ4Q7F
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34YQVAUMN18
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34XJQ0F2BDL
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34NDTZL82TF
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34G9FPT0J8H
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R347CGCALDSM
$5 off any purchase of $39 or more
R34H03O3UE3Y
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34CGQEJ4YWW
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34IY3GD3FIO
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34JQSV84S5U
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34HPIKVV114
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34RCQQYAVCI
$10 off any purchase of $100 or more
R34Z4Z57X5LK
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34B6PNTKQ36
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34P0VN1ZG1L
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R345XJG2DC0P
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R340NRWY2BUR
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34G8R8X5VD0
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34GECNW2W7D
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34NZE5CAKJ4
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34C2WAILVS0
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34JBS4UT2C7
$20 off any purchase of $175 or more
R34ZR6DQQJQF
$50 off any purchase of $350 or more
R34PCKFH33W6
$50 off any purchase of $350 or more
R34FVUITT73L
$75 off any purchase of $475 or more
R34MYMSKWGAO
$75 off any purchase of $475 or more
R344AVAVER68
$100 off any purchase of $525 or more
R34VXY7DP4HB

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Birth Certificates of Adoptees in Pennsylvania

In November of 2017, Pennsylvania began providing adopted persons information from their original, sealed birth certificate.

The disappointment was that the document was a limited transcription and not a copy of the original record, in contrast to the title.



In response to criticism about the limitations of this document, Pennsylvania re-issued the birth records on nicer paper.



The problem here is that the law (2016 Act 127) authorizes release of a "summary" of the original birth certificate and not the original birth certificate. Pennsylvania Department of Health labels the document "Noncertified Copy of Original Birth Record," and not something more accurate such as "Selective Extraction of a Birth Record."

The information available is the date and county (not town) of birth, original name of baby, and names and ages of parents. This information could lead adoptees to find their biological families. But the missing information might be needed if the named parent or parents is not enough. More information increases the chances of success.

The person who kindly supplied me with her "original birth certificate" identified her biological mother shortly before receiving the document. That will be explained in an upcoming post. The biological father has not been identified (yet) through DNA testing and unfortunately was not named in this birth record.

In January of 2017 neighboring New Jersey unsealed birth certificates to adoptees. In contrast to Pennsylvania, New Jersey's document for adoptees is a copy of the actual birth certificate and not an extraction.


For the person who kindly supplied this unsealed New Jersey birth certificate, the biological mother was previously identified in the adoption records of the court, which were not sealed because the adoption was before 1940. The father was identified through DNA testing before the release of this certificate. The names of the parents on this certificate, however, do not match the court records and the interpretations of DNA testing.