Growing family trees from leaves and branches. Finding lost relatives. Solving family mysteries. Concentrating in New Jersey and New York.
Pages
- Home
- Surnames and Locations of My GGG Grandparents
- DURYEA New Jersey Births
- DURYEA New Jersey Marriages
- DURYEA New Jersey Deaths
- DURYEA New York State Marriage Index
- DURYEA New York State Death Index 1881-1950
- Pictures by Clifford Lutter 1930s-1960s New Jersey
- ODonnell- New Jersey Records
- Hit or Miss Records
- DNA Comparisons
- Genealogy Humor
- Bayonne Neighbors
Friday, April 21, 2017
DNA at My Heritage
Based on a recommendation over at Your Genetic Genealogist, I uploaded DNA test results to My Heritage. This is (currently) a free service.
The site offers its own DNA testing. They do not have a pool of customers comparable to the big three (23andMe, Family Tree DNA, and Ancestry.com/DNA), so you will not have as many matches. There have also been questions concerning how My Heritage computes matches.
Because My Heritage has its own testing service, some people may have tested only at that particular site. If you are looking for a recent non-parental even (which is my situation), then it's worth checking out this other database.
You never know where the missing link tested his/her DNA. (And didn't transfer the results to any other site.)
So far, only my results are computed. I have 45 matches at My Heritage. For comparison, I have thousands of matches at the other sites.
My top match is probably a good one. I like the information displayed:
-shared percentage
-total centimorgans
-longest segment
-possible range of relationship
-age of match
-direct link to match in the family tree
I don't see a chromosome browser. Without seeing the actual shared segments, there is nothing else I can do with this match if we don't see commonality in our family trees.
When my parent's results are in, this match should appear near the top of either my mother's or my father's matches, providing more direction.
I still do not like the family tree display at My Heritage. It explodes into siblings and spouses instead of direct ancestors and drops where you were in the tree. The default setting displays women by the surnames of their husbands. You can change this, but most people don't. I don't need to see a woman's husband's name twice. I need to see her name.
Further displeasure arrived in an email, encouraging me to add an entire branch to my tree with just a few clicks. Folks, this is not how genealogical research is done.
Labels:
atDNA,
MyHeritage
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment